This chapter presented a unique view and an analysis to schooling in poor countries. The article that I read in the Economist touched on the similar problems of schooling in South Africa. What I found interesting in the article I read was the almost “incentive” process that the school system provided. Albert Dove, an extremely poor student attending a public school in South Africa was given free food daily to attend school. This is not too different than the PROGRESA program that Poor Economics talks about. The PROGRESA program provides cash rewards to families for school attendance. What I find interesting is the idea of a  reward system. After reading both the book and the article, it makes sense. While most parents want to give their kids an education, many times, keeping their kids home to work is a better economic decision. The data behind both programs was successful. In both cases, the individual or individuals had a higher school attendance and completion rate because of the programs. What I am not understanding, and Poor Economics does a wonderful job touching on this, is the idea that its not that parents need to be forced to send their kids to school, its the underlying fact that they need help financially. 

I understand that I only picked one topic in a pretty expansive chapter but in this chapter this is what really interests me. It is the idea that the amount of education a child receives is based on how financially stable the family is. It almost seems that its another poverty trap. Without education there is minimal chance of a child “moving up” but without the backing of a financially stable family it is unlikely that a child will attend school, and more importantly learn, where he/she can advance themselves. While the book offers some ideas that have worked, I don’t think that there is a universal answer how to best solve the education problem.


This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Education

  1. campwi02 says:

    I enjoyed your post and you did a fine job comparing the PROGRESA program, portrayed in the book, to the incentive process of providing children with food, portrayed in the article. I definitely agree with your conclusion that there is no universal answer in order to solve the education problem. The book does give several possible solutions, but none really seemed to substantial. The only thing I would have wanted to see more of in this post was maybe some numbers and data from the book as well as the article explaining your compare and contrast observations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s